Skip to content
CHICKENPIE.Start a project →
Tool Tuesday

I paid for Cursor Pro for three months. Here's my honest take.

Three months of Cursor Pro. The good (Composer is real), the bad (free tier is a trap), and the honest pricing math before you subscribe.

Tool
Cursor
Rating
4 / 5
Price at publication
Free (limited) / $20/mo Pro / $40/mo Business
Visit the tool ↗
Read the paper ↓
Cursor AI IDE open on MacBook Pro on a minimal desk, with a small CHKN chicken cartoon character in the corner
A PAPER FROM THE DESK
THE DETAILS
At a glance
CategoryTool Tuesday
PublishedJun 03, 2026
Read time6 min
Covered here
  • AI Tools
  • Productivity

What works

  • Composer edits across multiple files with per-change approval — not just autocomplete
  • Codebase-aware context finds bugs across files you haven't opened in months
  • Auto mode is effectively unlimited for daily dev work — credits only burn on manual model selection
  • VS Code foundation: zero IDE relearning, full extension compatibility

The tradeoffs

  • Free tier exhausts in 4 days of real use — it's a demo, not a working tier
  • Privacy Mode (stops cloud code sync) is opt-in and not surfaced during onboarding
  • VS Code only — no JetBrains, Xcode, or Neovim support
  • Credit system documentation is confusing; Auto mode behavior isn't explained at sign-up

I paid for Cursor Pro for three months. I'm still debating whether I'll renew for a fourth — not because it doesn't work, but because it works well enough that I keep asking whether I'm paying for the tool or paying to avoid thinking.

What it actually does

Cursor is VS Code. Same editor, same extensions, same keybindings — with an AI layer built into the architecture rather than bolted on as an extension. That distinction matters more than it sounds. Where Copilot feels like an autocomplete widget living inside your IDE, Cursor feels like the IDE was designed with AI as a first-class citizen. You get inline completions (Tab), a chat sidebar that can answer questions about your codebase, and Composer — multi-file agentic editing. The one that changes your workflow is Composer.

Who it's for

  • Solopreneurs and indie developers shipping code multiple hours a day
  • Anyone already living in VS Code who doesn't want to relearn an editor
  • Developers doing multi-file refactors that currently eat half their afternoon
  • People building MVPs who want to compress idea → working prototype from a week to a day

Who it's NOT for

  • Designers or marketers who write occasional scripts — the free tier expires in days of real use
  • Teams needing IDE diversity (JetBrains, Xcode, Neovim) — Cursor is VS Code only
  • Contract developers working under client NDAs who don't read setup docs — cloud context is on by default and Privacy Mode requires deliberate setup
  • Mobile-first developers — the gains skew backend and web-heavy

The 3 things it does best

1. Composer doesn't just write code — it edits the right files

You tell it "add rate limiting to the auth endpoint and update the tests." It opens the auth file, the middleware, the test file. It makes the changes. It shows you a diff. You approve or reject each edit individually. The first time this worked as advertised, I spent twenty minutes checking what it changed — not because I suspected errors, but because I'd genuinely forgotten what I asked it to do three minutes earlier. That's how much it compressed the work.

2. The codebase is the context

Copilot knows the file you're in. Cursor knows the codebase. Hit Cmd+K in any file and you can ask a question that references functions three levels deep. I tracked down a time-zone calculation error in a utility file I hadn't opened in six months — the kind of bug that only misfires on Saturday nights at midnight in specific locales. Two days I'd spent on that. Cursor found the file in under a minute.

3. Auto mode is effectively unlimited — and it's good enough

The credit system Cursor introduced in mid-2025 sounds alarming: a $20 monthly credit pool that depletes based on which AI model you pick. The reality is more forgiving. Auto mode routes your request to the right model for the task. For daily dev work — completions, Composer edits, codebase questions — Auto mode handles it without touching your credit pool. The credits only burn if you're manually reaching for the most expensive frontier model on every request. Most users don't do that.

The 2 things that annoy me

1. The free tier is a demo, not a product

2,000 completions per month sounds reasonable until a productive afternoon burns through 300–400 of them. I exhausted the free tier in four days of real work — a landing page, three API routes, some UI components. Not exceptional output for four days. The free tier is real enough to hook you and artificial enough to push you toward a subscription within a week. That's the design intent. It works. Know it going in.

2. Privacy Mode is opt-in and buried

On first install, Cursor sends code snippets to its servers for context processing. Privacy Mode exists and disables this — but it's not surfaced during onboarding. I found it three days in, while reviewing a client project governed by an NDA. The setting is in Settings → Cursor Tab → Privacy Mode. Enable it before you open your first real project. If you're doing any contract work, this isn't optional — it's the first configuration change you make.

Pricing reality check

Free — $0:

2,000 completions, 50 slow premium requests — enough to evaluate, not enough to work.

Pro — $20/mo (~$192/yr):

Unlimited Tab completions, Auto mode is effectively unlimited, $20 credit pool for manual premium model selection.

Business — $40/user/mo:

Team management, SSO, centralized billing.

The honest math: at $20/month, you need to recover 2–3 hours of coding time to break even. If you're billing $50/hour and shipping code daily, that's not a hard bar. Most Cursor users report recovering that time in the first week. If you're coding occasionally — light scripts, one day a week — start with GitHub Copilot at $10/month instead and revisit when the volume justifies it.

Alternatives

Windsurf ($15/month):

80% of Cursor's capability at 75% of the price. Faster autocomplete latency, genuinely useful flow-state awareness. Best choice if $20/month is a deliberate consideration.

GitHub Copilot ($10/month):

Widest IDE support (VS Code, JetBrains, Xcode, Neovim), tightest GitHub integration, easiest enterprise budget approval. Issues-to-PRs agent feature is a legitimate differentiator for GitHub-native teams.

Claude Code (usage-based):

Terminal-first agentic work, no IDE lock-in, best for complex cross-repo refactors via CLI. Worth trying before committing to a monthly subscription.

Verdict, restated

Cursor Pro is the right tool if you're writing code at least a few hours a day and already living in VS Code. The Composer multi-file editing and codebase-aware context are genuinely differentiated — not "general AI boost," but specific time savings on specific tasks I can name. The free tier is a deliberate hook that expires fast. Privacy Mode needs active setup before you open real work. And the $20/month only makes sense if you're actually shipping.

No affiliate deal available for Cursor at time of writing. Pricing and features verified June 2026.

What should I review next?

Drop a vote in the comments: Windsurf? Perplexity? Reclaim.ai? ElevenLabs? Tell me what's in your stack right now.

Share
MORE FROM THIS LITTLE DESK

A little worth keeping.

Stories, experiments, and things I find along the way. Occasionally, in your inbox.

Get the letter ↗
/feed/cursor-review-2026

Have a project in mind?

Tell us what you are making and what you need. An unfinished idea is welcome too.

Start a project →

Another paper for you.

Mr. Chicken sitting at a small desk coding on a laptop with an offline cloud icon on screen, in a brick-walled room

BiNeuron promises a local AI coding assistant with no cloud bill. Here's what "local" actually costs you.

BiNeuron is a free, open-source, fully-offline AI coding assistant. Here's what the whole-file-replacement design, the Tkinter GUI, and the 2-star repo status actually mean before you install it.

Open paper
CHKN flat-vector illustration: Mr. Chicken in a navy hoodie at a home-office desk searching a laptop media library, hard drives and notebook beside him

Clipto just raised $15M to be your computer's memory. It's good. It's not there yet.

Clipto's local AI media search is real and useful. The pricing page contradicting itself and a shaky Windows beta keep it from a full recommendation.

Open paper
Mr. Chicken at a desk pointing at a laptop screen showing a colorful AI-generated image, with reference photos stacked nearby

6 AI Art Tool Tips That Stop Your Marketing Images From Screaming "AI"

6 quick tips for using AI art tools like Nano Banana and Gemini 3 to make marketing visuals that don't scream "AI" — prompting, texture, consistency, and a pre-publish check.

Open paper
Chickenpie mascot Mr. Chicken pointing at a glowing screen showing chaotic color swatches organizing into labeled design system tokens

Stop Hardcoding Colors: Build a Real Design System with Figma Variables

A hands-on 9-step tutorial: wire a Primitives, Semantic, and Brand variable system in Figma so your whole file updates from one place, light mode and dark mode included.

Open paper
Mr. Chicken at a cluttered home studio desk, working on an AI image generation interface with an uncanny AI-slop draft on one side and a clean composited image on the other

How to Art-Direct AI Images So They Stop Looking Like AI

Nine steps to art-direct AI image generation like a photographer, not a wishlist — light, texture, junk tokens, and the two spots (hands, signage) that always give it away.

Open paper
Mr. Chicken at a nighttime desk poking a laptop screen showing a bouncy Lottie squeeze-toy animation

I Tried to Build a Clickable Lottie Squeeze Toy. It Took Three Tries to Feel Right.

Watch three failed attempts to build an interactive Lottie squeeze toy — from a dead mousemove hack to a broken freeze-frame click, to the segment-based fix that finally feels tactile.

Open paper

You might also like